Many employers assume that
if they carry out regular inspections of production machines, in line with the
Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER), that they have done
all that is necessary to meet their legal obligations.
In particular, responsible organisations are careful to ensure that their
machines are inspected in line with Section 6 of PUWER, which includes a
requirement that if machines are exposed to conditions that may lead to
deterioration, the inspections must be repeated "at suitable
intervals". Since, in reality, every machine is exposed to conditions that
may lead to deterioration, the requirement effectively means that all machines
must be regularly inspected.
It would seem reasonable to assume that, provided these PUWER inspections are
conducted conscientiously and at appropriate intervals, machinery is safe.
Unfortunately, if that machinery incorporates electro-sensitive protective
equipment (ESPE), this may not be the case.
ESPE includes, light guards and laser scanners, and is increasingly taking the
place of traditional guarding on machines. Because of the growing popularity of
ESPE and the need to ensure that it is properly used and maintained, the Health
and Safety Executive (HSE) has published guidance note HSG180, ‘Application of
electro-sensitive equipment using light curtains and light beam devices to
machinery’.
The section of HSG180 that deals with inspection refers directly to Section 6
of PUWER and also states that "inspection and testing is required where the
safe operation [of the ESPE] is critically dependent on its condition in use
and deterioration would lead to a significant risk to the operator or other
worker. If this is the case, then installations using ESPE should be inspected
at suitable intervals."
The right timing
Of course, this raises the question of what a suitable interval is. The answer
is provided in paragraph 124 of HSG180, which states that "the recommended
maximum period between each periodic inspection and test is six months for type
4 ESPE and twelve months for type 2 ESPE, but this will depend on the equipment
it is fitted to and the risk as a whole."
The types of ESPE referred to in HSG180 are defined in IEC 61496-1, ‘Safety of
machinery, Electro-sensitive protective equipment; Part 1: General requirements
and tests’. Type 2 ESPE has a means of periodic test to reveal a failure to
danger, while Type 4 will not fail to danger for a single fault and is
resistant to an accumulation of single faults.
By now it will be clear that the frequency of periodic testing required for
ESPE depends on multiple factors, and that a six-month interval will apply in
many cases. Now consider the periodic PUWER assessments. There is, of course,
no simple answer to the question of how often these should be carried out, but
the norm seems to be annual assessments. In many cases this will not be regular
enough to meet the recommendations of HSG180 for ESPE installed on a machine.
This means that that inspection of ESPE must be treated as a separate task, and
not simply as part of the routine PUWER assessments.
The right person
HSG180 also raises the issue of the competence of the person performing the
inspection as there are many factors that require skilful evaluation. These
include ensuring that the equipment is the correct distance from the danger
zone; ensuring suitable safeguards prevent access to the danger zone from
directions not covered by the ESPE; testing the overall response time and the
detection capability; inspecting the stopping performance monitor; and testing
the primary machine control elements to ensure correct functionality.
Once the ESPE inspection has been completed it must also be documented so that
evidence can be produced to verify that the appropriate inspection regime has
been followed.
The use of ESPE on machines offers many benefits and, if correctly applied, can
provide levels of safety at least as good as those offered by more conventional
guarding and protection techniques. However, to ensure that ESPE dependably
fulfils its purpose, simply relying on routine PUWER inspections is not enough
and it must be regularly inspected and tested against the HSE guidance note
HSG180. So, while this topic remains fresh in your mind, it is advisable to
start making your ESPE inspection plans right now.
No comments:
Post a Comment